Monday, January 4, 2016

How do you like this style?

This template seems pleasant and readable. My sub-head styles seem OK, too.

13 comments:

Trekker said...

Oh, this is nice! Well done!

Dee said...

Your old one matched the near defunct TEM website better of course.

But it's fresher and more clear, for sure. Readability improved. The green of the banner a bit too much for my taste but I could live with it, my brain will tune it out. And I've the User Styles extension in Firefox if I really want it gone :)

Dee

Darin Kadrioski said...

Much gooder.

JayB said...

Excellent! Much easier on these antique eyes.

DRoomes said...

Expat - I only just now stumbled upon your blog and I am an instant fan. I just wanted to say "thank you"! Thank you for this wonderful source of rationality and critical thinking. It makes me happy to know that this blog, and other sites like it, are helping to beat back the tide of pseudoscience. Keep up the great work!

Anonymous said...

Miles better!

Change the greenery for some nebula or other and it'll be all good.

Chris Lopes said...

Yes it is much nicer than the ode to 1995 style you were mocking.

Binaryspellbook said...

Point by point critique of Mike Bara's the choice has (for me anyway) yellow font on white background where you write FACT: .......

Not being picky :-)

Trekker said...

I agree, Binary. That's a bit hard to read, all right.

expat said...

Fixed. There's probably more yellow in other point-by-points. I'll get to them.

Binaryspellbook said...

Still seeing old format on my mobile.

expat said...

Try that then, squire. They don't give you as much latitude for customizing the mob style.

Binaryspellbook said...

Looks awesome on both desktop and mobile.