First, Von Braun's Secret was falsified because of fatal mathematical errors.
Then, the Table of Coincidence fell off its legs because 19 of 42 data points were invalid per Hoagland & Bara's own published rules. With it went the whole daft idea of NASA's worship of Egyptian Gods.
Next was the Accutron "measurement" of the torsion field. Quite apart from the inadequacy of the protocol and the lack of key data, Hoagland accidentally revealed in Glendale that the baseline readings showed as much activity as his claimed data spikes.
Comes now Dr Stuart Robbins, with a blog and a professional-standard video that takes apart another key part of the edifice, stone by stone.
The topic is what Hoagland (originally with co-author Errol Torun) called The Message of Cydonia. The theory -- to over-dignify what amounts to a whole lot of flim-flam -- rests on these two composite diagrams of the Cydonia area of Mars. Mike Bara recycled them, without specific attribution, in his inaccurate book Ancient Aliens on Mars.
credit: Hoagland & Torun
credit: Hoagland & Torun
In the first, 19 angles have been created by connecting 16 marsographical features in a pseudo-random way. The authors then make the claim that nine ratios of these angles equate to simple arithmetical expressions such as √3, e/π etc. The accuracy claimed is three significant figures.
In the second, something similar is done with the pseudo-pyramid Hoagland calls "D&M." Robbins' suspicion was immediately aroused when he noted that the list of angles and ratios in the two composites is identical. It suggests work that is so sloppy as to self-falsify.
Watch the video
For those who can't do that, here are a few bullet points:
- No two pairs of edges of the D&M actually converge at the same apex
- 9 angles are considered significant in the D&M, but in fact 35 angles are inherent
- The angles are in any case projections onto a horizontal plane. In 3-D reality they would all be different
- 595 angle ratios can be derived from the geometry
- 94 arithmetical expressions would qualify per the authors' implicit rules
- Only one of the nine ratios is accurate to the claimed tolerance of 0.1%
- Generating 16,000 random pentagonal shapes similar to the D&M, and using computer analysis, Robbins creates a null hypothesis and shows that Hoagland's nine equations are no less probable
- Re-checking the larger Cydonia map, Robbins could confirm Hoagland's data in only seven of the 19 angles, within 1% tolerance
The video is an excellent piece of skeptical reasoning that is so clearly presented, even Bara might be able to follow it. Dr. Robbins manages to explain in detail what most of us understood intuitively but were unable to put in words. I hope this is just the first of many video take downs of such nonsense.
Hoagland and Bara have just had their arses handed to them.
Indeed Chris. I'm hoping Dr Robbins will continue making videos of this nature. There is plenty of material around to do it. Glass towers, domes, the face of course.
Both Hoagland and Bara present a target rich environment.
Interesting comments to the video from ATS members: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1015604/pg1&mem=
Splendid video, thanks Dr. Robbins!
The only critique I have that it was made one or even two decades too late ;-) The magic numbers never were able to impress me and I suspect they fulfil a more "ritual" function in the space religion institute the Enterprise Mission attempted to become, at the time. And being ritualistic in nature, they remain somewhat above and beyond criticism, for the believer at least. And they still may well be. But a few sincere doubters will find more reason to doubt and perhaps shelf the case permanently. So there's that.
My own fascination of Cydonia never went much further than the surprising regular shape of the base of the mesa itself. But after seeing much more imagery over the year that wonder changed into just wondering about all the intrigues embedded in landscapes on all other planetary bodies. I guess it's what fuels the passion of scientists in the first place. At least, some of them.
Thanks all, I'm glad you like it. And I'm amazed that after being up for just under 5 days, it's going to surpass 10,000 views in a few hours ... maybe within the hour. To me, that's amazing, and says something about not only those who've helped to spread the wired about the movie, but interest in the topic and perhaps even interest in critical thinking.
Nice video. You obviously put a lot of work into the number crunching. Good job.
Post a Comment