tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post2812630858627722203..comments2023-12-19T09:40:12.020-08:00Comments on The Emoluments of Mars: Bang-bang! DOJ shoots down Sean David Mortonexpathttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10369924104634464934noreply@blogger.comBlogger17125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-27831013283124360062019-09-02T07:32:10.538-07:002019-09-02T07:32:10.538-07:00Joe: Thanks for your comments. Youe assertion &quo...Joe: Thanks for your comments. Youe assertion "they won't ever pay" in relation to the IRS is plainly false. An important part of this very lawsuit is that the IRS paid the Mortons.expathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10369924104634464934noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-65889286363660626052019-09-01T21:13:59.929-07:002019-09-01T21:13:59.929-07:00Better for them to try to shuffle it under the rug...Better for them to try to shuffle it under the rug than to expose the real financial workings inside the government/banking/courts racket. Yeah, the objective here was to shut him up. <br /><br />I used to listen to Brandon Alexander Adams about this sort of tax manuver. I think the 1099 oid "origional issue discount" method to not abandon funds to the banks was an interesting approach.<br /><br />I draw a great deal from their accepted for value messages in the forgiveness money I an seeking to popularize. Drawing on the infinite personal worth of an individual ... even such as Mr. Morton. Joe Bakerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17364003343897500934noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-70129247045463060332019-09-01T21:02:17.935-07:002019-09-01T21:02:17.935-07:00I'd like to help Morton file a counter suit of...I'd like to help Morton file a counter suit offering a forgiveness contract to the proponents of these terrorist organizations (Irs, DOJ, etc.... They will never respond to the notices, they won't ever pay, they will frolic in their dishonor while we create financial instruments bearing the value of the forgiveness so the markets may side with mr. Morton if they so choose. <br /><br />I can imagine now the notice of related case... <br /><br />Remedycoin.comJoe Bakerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17364003343897500934noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-58525716536798734812019-08-06T07:16:42.341-07:002019-08-06T07:16:42.341-07:00Just to clarify, before the Ninth Circuit allowed ...Just to clarify, before the Ninth Circuit allowed Morton to represent himself on appeal, the court appointed a commissioner who held a hearing to determine whether Sean should be allowed on appeal to proceed per se. The commissioner recommended that Sean be able to do so. Morton filed a <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dv3di2ioyXV2r0CzJmbglMQgT4xYwANR/view?usp=drivesdk" rel="nofollow">response</a> stating that he "wholeheartedly" agreed "with the wisdom and good judgement of the Appellate Commissioner that I do NOT need to re-presented and wish to proceed pro-per." The Ninth Circuit granted his wish. <br /><br />He was not unfairly denied his right to counsel.Ericksonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13489446146745522101noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-90541072562976370412019-08-04T09:38:53.533-07:002019-08-04T09:38:53.533-07:00I'd say he screwed himself. I mean, what kind ...I'd say he screwed himself. I mean, what kind of brainless moron do you have to be, to create totally fake paperwork with titles like “’Non-Negotiable’ Discharging Bond and Indemnity” or “Coupon for Setoff Settlement and Closure”, send them to the IRS and expect them to be accepted at face value? expathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10369924104634464934noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-17224305629151225042019-08-03T15:06:27.226-07:002019-08-03T15:06:27.226-07:00Ninth Circuit??? He's screwed!!!Ninth Circuit??? He's screwed!!!THEnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-2741440397254671472019-08-03T13:56:45.073-07:002019-08-03T13:56:45.073-07:00Yes, he filed his appeal in May. There's no re...Yes, he <a href="https://dorkmission.blogspot.com/2019/06/sean-david-morton-completely-incompetent.html" rel="nofollow">filed his appeal in May</a>. There's no reason to think the Ninth Circuit will be anything but fair in reviewing it.expathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10369924104634464934noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-69829393680154787752019-08-03T13:43:36.816-07:002019-08-03T13:43:36.816-07:00I believe you've stated in a thread below, tha...I believe you've stated in a thread below, that Morton filed for an appeal, himself. If it gets rejected, then he needs to request an attorney to refile for appeal. He is entitled to a fair appeal, irrespective of past behavior, and he will get one.THEnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-2812854974381007242019-08-03T07:49:41.175-07:002019-08-03T07:49:41.175-07:00Theadora: SDM has only been on trial once.
The Nin...Theadora: SDM has only been on trial once.<br />The Ninth Circuit has not yet ruled on the appeal.<br /><br />Here are the Govt. attorneys' comments on SDM's very late request for representation:<br /><br />« He made no objection to representing himself during the initial phase of the sentencing hearing. Rather, defendant made this request after an 85-minute speech wherein, among other things, he accused the government and the court of collusion, argued that the court lacked jurisdiction over him, and demanded that his accuser, the United States of America, be brought to court. Defendant even stated that he did not know what the charges brought against him were, even though he had personally prepared and filed dozens of pleadings and motions arguing about those charges. Defendant’s argument attacked the legitimacy of the investigation, the prosecution, the trial, his conviction, his co-defendant’s counsel, and the sentencing proceeding itself. After defendant spoke at great length (approximately 45 pages of transcript), defendant’s request occurred at the very point the court announced it was going to pronounce the sentence. Defendant’s request was apparent for what it was -- a<br />maneuver designed to delay his day of judgment. A court must be wary of the “right of counsel” being used as a ploy to gain time and effect delay. Defendant had already delayed the pronouncement of his sentence when he failed to appear at his originally scheduling sentencing hearing. He failed to self-surrender pursuant to a bench warrant, and needed to be arrested by federal officials. Defendant’s conduct at the sentencing hearing, especially when he requested counsel, was clearly dilatory and was meant to hinder the efficient administration of justice. Thus, the district court’s denial of defendant’s request for counsel did not violate his Sixth Amendment rights. »<br />expathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10369924104634464934noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-60270370753711062012019-08-02T19:21:03.097-07:002019-08-02T19:21:03.097-07:00But Kerry Cassidy says SDM is a legal savant. I on...But Kerry Cassidy says SDM is a legal savant. I once saw him wearing Harry Potter style robes whilst posing with a cat. Surely this must mean something.Binaryspellbookhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17267580272489277927noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-13884992372652133432019-08-02T17:59:45.533-07:002019-08-02T17:59:45.533-07:00Was Morton's request for an attorney after con...Was Morton's request for an attorney after conviction and before sentencing in the first trial? If so, then that would be too late, but he would be entitled to file an appeal.<br /><br />Did he file an appeal with a request for an attorney which was denied? He shouldn't have been allowed to file for an appeal himself without an attorney. That is different grounds. If the judge was actually, hearing Morton's appeal and denied him an attorney, that would be a mistrial, unless he also, waived the attorney on the appeal until just prior to sentencing again.THEnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-5583213008633624382019-08-02T13:51:11.618-07:002019-08-02T13:51:11.618-07:00On what grounds?On what grounds?expathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10369924104634464934noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-55272468932996915572019-08-02T13:17:07.059-07:002019-08-02T13:17:07.059-07:00Morton can file for Mistrial, and he'd be righ...Morton can file for Mistrial, and he'd be right. THEnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-88230508823845516792019-08-02T09:09:13.283-07:002019-08-02T09:09:13.283-07:00It's interesting to me that on four occasions ...It's interesting to me that on four occasions the IRS, faced with a clearly fraudulent claim, simply denied it as "frivolous" rather than prosecuting immediately.expathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10369924104634464934noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-87432510402665841122019-08-02T09:06:21.773-07:002019-08-02T09:06:21.773-07:00Theadora: So you think the law allows a defendant ...Theadora: So you think the law allows a defendant to appeal TWICE on the same grounds? Got a precedent for that?expathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10369924104634464934noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-36900276374718926152019-08-01T15:40:22.887-07:002019-08-01T15:40:22.887-07:00Morton has grounds for another appeal, based upon ...Morton has grounds for another appeal, based upon the fact the his request for legal counsel on appeal was denied. Not that it will matter. A Court appointed attorney as an Officer of the Court, will advise him to plead guilty and refuse to mouth the arguments that Morton would undoubtedly insist that the attorney make.THEnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-61757563501496422732019-08-01T12:32:11.528-07:002019-08-01T12:32:11.528-07:00In the interests of brevity, I elided several key ...In the interests of brevity, I elided several key points from the DOJ brief. Readers who have a particlular interest in the Mortons' crimes might like these excerpts from pp.7-9<br /><br />« Defendant included a document marked “Coupon for Setoff Settlement and Closure” with a stated value of $5,286,867. The document bore a verisimilitude to a bank or cashier’s check, and contained numerous indicia of a typical financial instrument, including a routing number, account number, payment amount, and endorsement. In truth, the purported instrument was completely fictitious; the routing number listed on the document did not correspond to a consumer financial institution, but rather to an account with the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. <br /><br />In April 2013, defendant submitted documents labeled “’Non-Negotiable’ Discharging Bond and Indemnity” (“discharging bonds”) to the IRS as alleged payment for their debts. The discharging bonds were drafted to appear like securities issued by a corporation or government entity; they were printed on paper ringed in an ornate border and were littered with technical jargon and official-sounding identifiers, such as “ISIN #,” “Registration #,” and “CUSIP #.” These discharging bonds listed defendants as issuers and the Internal<br />Revenue Service as beneficiary, with the United States Treasury Department designated as “securities intermediary.” »expathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10369924104634464934noreply@blogger.com