tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post1561566559361854125..comments2023-12-19T09:40:12.020-08:00Comments on The Emoluments of Mars: Jimmy Church slams Sean David Mortonexpathttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10369924104634464934noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-1017736210898487462019-01-28T20:58:45.937-08:002019-01-28T20:58:45.937-08:00Great comments .
Om Oct 22 2018
A full descriptio...Great comments .<br />Om Oct 22 2018 <br />A full description discussion / portrait of Jimmy Church and his involvement with trade mark issues is worth ;LISTENING AND READING THE CHAT TEXT .<br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRPG7MCUaLo&t=902s<br />On another topic concerning DISCERNMENT IN PROGRAMMING CONTENT BROADCAST OF FCC SANCTIONED AVENUES <br />RESEARCHER KEVIN MOORE INTERVIEWS JIMMY CHURCH AND THE OUTCOME IS RATHER CLEAR THAT SOME BROADCASTERS HAVE MANY SHIFTING POSITIONS AND NO ETHICAL STAND AT ALL - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QhHsOoGch0&t=620sBruce Rosshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13307244907610721601noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-16493555113164741932017-09-23T10:58:41.011-07:002017-09-23T10:58:41.011-07:00Thanks for the comment. No, it's a dead cert t...<i><br />Thanks for the comment. No, it's a dead cert that Church didn't truly understand how that check for (actually $480,323) mysteriously appeared in the Mortons' mailbox.<br /></i><br /><br />Crikey! If someone <i>I</i> knew had a cheque for $480,323 materialise in his mailbox, I would be all questions as to how it got there. I would think such incuriosity ill befits a chat show host. <br /><br />Of course, if he's on <i>Coast to Coast AM</i> regularly, that would explain the incuriosity, as uncritical acceptance of anything a guest says, however ludicrous, seems to be a prerequisite for working there.<br /><br />It would also explain why Church was off by $63,000* when he said Morton, "took out $7,000 in cash," poor fact-checking being another CtC deficiency. Morton did, in fact, take out $70,000 and used it to purchase a new BMW automobile if I recall rightly.<br /><br />Anyhow, thank you for the clarification.<br /><br /><br />WS<br /><br />*Unless that was an error in the transcription, which can happen to the best of us.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-46784086299951369302017-09-23T07:32:21.235-07:002017-09-23T07:32:21.235-07:00Thanks for the comment. No, it's a dead cert t...Thanks for the comment. No, it's a dead cert that Church didn't truly understand how that check for (actually $480,323) mysteriously appeared in the Mortons' mailbox. expathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10369924104634464934noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-14486255078034296332017-09-23T07:09:11.769-07:002017-09-23T07:09:11.769-07:00if you have a check in your hand for half a millio...<i>if you have a check in your hand for half a million dollars, and you know it ain't your money, you don't cash it.</i><br /><br />More to the point, Mr. Church, if you are not eligible for a tax refund, <i>don't file a claim for one</i>. That way, you will never have to face the temptation of having a cheque in your hands for a sum of money you know is not yours.<br /><br />Expat, I realise that your blog post contained only a partial transcript (that's not a knock, by the way; I know how tedious transcription work can be, having done a fair bit of it myself). However, on the face of things, at least, it sounds an awful lot like J. Church is a member of the exclusive club* that actually believes all that bollocks SDM told Kerry Cassidy about how an "IRS computer error" caused a cheque for a half-million dollars to show up unbidden.<br /><br />Do you recall offhand if Church said anything during the "quick update" you mentioned that would turn this mere inference into something more substantial?<br /><br /><br />WS<br /><br />*A club so exclusive that Kerry Cassidy appears to be the only confirmed member to date (in M. Bara's case, I am convinced he is suffering from willful ignorance rather than Cassidy-class gullibility, rendering him ineligible for membership.)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-12775413243136820792017-09-22T16:57:12.873-07:002017-09-22T16:57:12.873-07:00A judge has the authority to reduce a sentence or ...A judge has the authority to reduce a sentence or overturn a guilty verdict, but can't impose a greater sentence or reverse a verdict of innocent. A convict might receive a life sentence for each count charged against him. These sentences can be ordered to be served either consecutively or concurrently. THE Orbs Whipererhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08651754060614417385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-1333592980070151852017-09-22T16:02:57.065-07:002017-09-22T16:02:57.065-07:00Yeah, beats me too.Yeah, beats me too.expathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10369924104634464934noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-64974332452099676642017-09-22T10:22:19.129-07:002017-09-22T10:22:19.129-07:00I'm puzzled by his sentence. There was talk o...I'm puzzled by his sentence. There was talk of multiple lifetimes, of 87 months, of extra time for going on the lam. Yet he got 72 months. What gives?Trekkernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-2995401608025819792017-09-21T11:50:13.141-07:002017-09-21T11:50:13.141-07:00What an idiot. He ought to have been quick to get...What an idiot. He ought to have been quick to get the money offshore and moved to Brazil, before the shit hit the fan.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com