tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post3008431056635041365..comments2023-12-19T09:40:12.020-08:00Comments on The Emoluments of Mars: Those glass domes on the Moonexpathttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10369924104634464934noreply@blogger.comBlogger49125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-41716700266500727932018-10-18T06:23:20.891-07:002018-10-18T06:23:20.891-07:00« If we exist then I'm sure other intelligent ...« If we exist then I'm sure other intelligent species exist it's impossible for it not to be. »<br /><br />That statement is false. Thanks for the comment.expathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10369924104634464934noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-59498617419113664562018-10-18T01:23:02.006-07:002018-10-18T01:23:02.006-07:00People that can't be trusted, they attack peop...People that can't be trusted, they attack people who they don't agree with, they put the word conspiracy on the others theory, when someone else debates them and gives a source to why the debunker is wrong and they fight it, then in the end claim something else. If it was what you said it was in the end why didn't you say that's what it was in the beginning instead of claiming they Manipulated the photo when they didn't. <br />Why would you think we are the first humans to have technology good enough for space travel? The earth is old and when anyone finds structures on Earth that don't fit with currently taught "scientific" timelines the person instantly gets attacked by the establishment and labled a nut job. Well a couple hundred years ago the "scientific" establishment taught that everything revolved around us that the Earth is flat and they would destroy people's lives if they tried to say different. Instead of attacking someones character and their beliefs because it differs from our current "scientific" beliefs which I must say are completely unscientific and close minded. The government lables stiff as conspiracy to try to discredit. Also NASA has many times cut feed to the ISS when objects appear that defy our understanding do why wouldn't they air brush, darken, or just outright lie to us. If we exist then I'm sure other intelligent species exist it's impossible for it not to be. The fact that we exist says it can happen. We barely understand anything to do with the entire universe and the fact that we think we are so intelligent and that it is impossible for other living beings to have much more advanced understanding of our universe is absolutely ignorant. We barely use 7% of our brains if we coukd access the rest why wouldn't teleportation, or travel that is faster then the speed of light be impossible? Who is to say that other species didn't use the moon eons ago? Ignorance is bliss I guess?Notclosemindednoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-71301762003100041342018-02-02T07:36:14.994-08:002018-02-02T07:36:14.994-08:00Yes, you are correct.Yes, you are correct.expathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10369924104634464934noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-43697612199680760352018-02-01T20:14:18.744-08:002018-02-01T20:14:18.744-08:00The moon )unlike hearth) with no atmosphere would ...The moon )unlike hearth) with no atmosphere would not burn up asteroids ; so to have a glass dome on it to live under would be dangerous over time.<br />Even a small asteroid could penetrate the glass .<br />The whole argument " does not hold air"... this delusional person just wants attention.Future Xtinctionhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04729004834129808032noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-83445257687939192472017-02-07T07:02:51.982-08:002017-02-07T07:02:51.982-08:00The Moon does have these domes the person wrote th...The Moon does have these domes the person wrote this article having done no real work I can see with laughing at the invisible domes. They are invisible in photos and the camera's do not pick them up. I use a tinted glass and a technique to see them. The truth is out there and many know it. I posted the cities on the Moon and the vast structured terrain. fgdgdhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07530989184869534019noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-31295989606387320552009-08-22T12:55:14.379-07:002009-08-22T12:55:14.379-07:00the most revealing thing was when it was claimed t...the most revealing thing was when it was claimed that earth was "atlantis" seems to be true to me because of puma puka and just google odd atrifacts, and you'll see the types of things that are there that should not be. This 'splains a lot to me.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-41777760109723986202009-08-14T22:24:52.950-07:002009-08-14T22:24:52.950-07:00I find Hoagland to be Trustworthy.
I am not sure ...I find Hoagland to be Trustworthy.<br /><br />I am not sure about you - <br />After you telling me that zooming on a photo is manipulating it (prism case)<br /><br />What would make me think he is a useless buffoon?<br />Him trying to be funny & not succeeding .<br /><br />What would make me think he is wrong?<br /><br />Perhaps a debate or at least an opportunity for him to respond to your specific questions.<br /><br />In which he will provide unreasonable answers.moon real-estatenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-83258357131017501332009-08-14T16:46:47.481-07:002009-08-14T16:46:47.481-07:00Well, moon real-estate, in this thread I've po...Well, moon real-estate, in this thread I've pointed out three occasions on which Hoagland was definitively WRONG. I've proved that he was also WRONG about the colors of the gnomon scale. Check further back in <a href="http://dorkmission.blogspot.com/2008/09/informed-criticism-yeah-we-got-that.html" rel="nofollow">this blog</a> for a few more examples of him being WRONG.<br /><br />What's it going to take to convince you that the man is a usless buffoon?expathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10369924104634464934noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-88352939411030387512009-08-14T14:19:39.639-07:002009-08-14T14:19:39.639-07:00I am not the one trying to debunk Hoagland.
OK i ...I am not the one trying to debunk Hoagland.<br /><br />OK i see it is turning into a trench war.<br /><br />Let it be as it is.<br /><br />See you on Mars :)moon real-estatenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-46913219035610089542009-08-14T07:14:01.145-07:002009-08-14T07:14:01.145-07:00>>That my Friend is a Prism.<<
That, m...>>That my Friend is a Prism.<<<br />That, my friend, is a spectral flare. Distorting the image to that extent shows nothing that is real.<br /><br />>>As for the Orange Red dispute -I find it highly unreasonable<<<br />Do you doubt the official Press Kit?<br /><br />>>Have you questioned him regarding that?<<<br />No -- have you?expathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10369924104634464934noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-89743765926064657632009-08-14T06:57:12.566-07:002009-08-14T06:57:12.566-07:00Sorry
But you don't need to manipulate that ...Sorry <br /><br />But you don't need to manipulate that photo in any way<br /><br />Just Zoom in on the Dark Space above that Hill<br /><br />That my Friend is a Prism.<br /><br />As for the Orange Red dispute - <br /><br />I find it highly unreasonable, if that was the case at hand - that RCH would not know this fact.<br /><br />Have you questioned him regarding that?moon real-estatenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-66247615420780210032009-08-14T06:01:33.700-07:002009-08-14T06:01:33.700-07:00>>BUT boy oh boy - that Beautiful straight l...>>BUT boy oh boy - that Beautiful straight long Prism - IS there<<<br /><br />That's not a prism, it's a spectral flare. My image editing software has no such control as "exposure," but I can make the flare appear by boosting gamma to 2.0 -- which is, of course, to totally distort the image.<br /><br />>>The OLD Man Wasn't lying - And you owe him an apology.<<<br /><br />Moon real-estate, you've somehow manged to miss the point here. Richard Hoagland is MISTAKEN in believing that the color patch on the gnomon is RED. IT IS NOT RED, IT IS ORANGE. THEREFORE ADJUSTING THE COLOR BALANCE TO MAKE IT RED IS CORRUPTING THE IMAGE, NOT CORRECTING IT.expathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10369924104634464934noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-51581861209311733442009-08-13T18:42:42.060-07:002009-08-13T18:42:42.060-07:00JESUS ChRist !
You don't even need to play wi...JESUS ChRist !<br /><br />You don't even need to play with that photo<br /><br />Check out the original From Nasa<br /><br />http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-134-20426HR.jpg<br /><br />And Just Zoom in the black sky over the hill thats on the far left<br /><br />The OLD Man Wasn't lying - And you owe him an apology.<br /><br />Houston over and outmoon real-estatenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-44181407275472548262009-08-13T18:36:37.197-07:002009-08-13T18:36:37.197-07:00Hi
I took Photo AS17-134-20426HR.jpg
And used Ip...Hi<br /><br />I took Photo AS17-134-20426HR.jpg<br /><br />And used Iphoto On may Mac - chose Edit and got the exposure all the way up<br /><br />I don't know how he got that color saturation fix<br />So I didn't get that "sun rise"<br /><br />BUT boy oh boy - that Beautiful straight long Prism - IS there<br /><br />I can see it now even without the extra exposure.<br /><br />BINGOmoon real-estatenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-24987052172873150522009-08-13T17:12:56.176-07:002009-08-13T17:12:56.176-07:00To "moon real-estate":
I've now fou...To "moon real-estate":<br /><br />I've now found that Apollo 17 Hasselblad frame in the catalog -- the one over which Hoagland is so hilariously mistaken about the color of the gnomon. It's AS17-134-20426HR.jpg, 752kb.<br /><br />Perhaps you could see if you can duplicate Hoagland's mistake.expathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10369924104634464934noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-4992053147249896792009-08-13T13:57:14.896-07:002009-08-13T13:57:14.896-07:00To "moon real-estate":
I did, however, ...To "moon real-estate":<br /><br />I did, however, find the Hasselblad frame showing Gene Cernan, part of the US flag, and the Earth in the sky above. It's AS17-134-20387HR.jpg, 600kb. Hoagland refers to this image just prior to the gnomon sequence on the Camelot video.<br /><br />I downloaded this image and increased both brightness and gamma, finding no trace of the "prism" that Hoagland claims to have found in the sky at upper right. Perhaps you could repeat this process yourself, and let me know what manipulations are needed to make that prism appear? Thank you.expathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10369924104634464934noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-11170473033213397402009-08-13T13:26:29.530-07:002009-08-13T13:26:29.530-07:00To "moon real-estate":
I haven't so...To "moon real-estate":<br /><br />I haven't so far been able to find that exact image in the on-line Apollo 17 catalog. However, I note this -- in the "Project Camelot" video, as he describes this image, Richard Hoagland refers to the gnomon as having red, blue, and green color patches. Now here is the authentic description of the gnomon, from the official Press kit:<br /><br />"Gnomon and Color Patch <br /><br />The gnomon is used as a photographic reference to establish local vertical Sun angle, scale, and lunar color. This tool consists of a weighted staff mounted on a tripod. It is constructed in such a way that the staff will right itself in a vertical position when the legs of the tripod are on the lunar surface. The part of the staff that extends above the tripod gimbal is painted with a gray scale from 5 to 35 percent reflectivity and a color scale of blue, orange, and green. The color patch, similarly painted in gray scale and color scale, mounted on one of the tripod legs provides a larger target for accurately determining colors in color photography."<br /><br />Did you get that, moon real-estate? Hoagland thinks the orange strip is supposed to be red. How accurate do you now think his recoloring of that image is?expathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10369924104634464934noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-48388911970168706872009-08-13T10:53:30.019-07:002009-08-13T10:53:30.019-07:00>>You Are wrong - it is not fixed yet - But ...>>You Are wrong - it is not fixed yet - But they think they have an Idea...<<<br />You'll need to explain why 14 shuttle missions have flown with complete success since Hoagland wrote that completely false essay.<br /><br />>>Read Hoaglands Post<<<br />Of course I've read it. Duhhhh..<br /><br />>>why mock him?<<<br />Because he's almost always DEAD WRONG.<br /><br />>>you are just hammering on him unjustifiably- without seeing the evidence<<<br />Hoagland's idea of "evidence" has nothing in common with scientific evidence. Regarding anomalies on Mars and the Moon, Hoagland writes "It looks like a crinoid, so it must be a crinoid. It looks like a robot head, so it must be a robot head." This is utterly laughable as evidence.expathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10369924104634464934noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-77568255543410727052009-08-13T10:33:42.502-07:002009-08-13T10:33:42.502-07:00Regarding ECO sensor
You Are wrong - it is not fi...Regarding ECO sensor<br /><br />You Are wrong - it is not fixed yet - But they think they have an Idea...<br />Just like they said in the first article you linked.<br /><br />Read Hoaglands Post - It was updated and explains more.<br /><br />He is Rasing a very good point regarding the Russian Hypothesis - why mock him?<br />I believe - he will be proved right<br />The question is - How will NASA admit the way it was fixed<br /><br />I am not for or against Hoagland in particular - but you are just hammering on him unjustifiably- without seeing the evidence<br />Sorrymoon real-estatenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-87933048526579539902009-08-13T07:12:01.273-07:002009-08-13T07:12:01.273-07:00Here's a better link for the ECO sensor fix:
h...Here's a better link for the ECO sensor fix:<br />http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/071227-sts122-sensor-update.htmlexpathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10369924104634464934noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-26811702851740802642009-08-13T06:54:32.015-07:002009-08-13T06:54:32.015-07:00>>No you don't - just pull the curser to...>>No you don't - just pull the curser to the right time it will start stream/downloading from there.<<<br />Yes, you're right. Thanks. I can probably find that Apollo 17 frame. Now please explain exactly what you mean by "bring the light up". As evidence of a lunar civilization, it's remarkably weak.<br /><br />>>Could you please reference me to the article Describing NASA's conventional problem solving<<<br /><br />Here's one:<br />http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2006/05/nasa-solving-its-eco-problems/expathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10369924104634464934noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-74010824005252649532009-08-13T00:26:22.560-07:002009-08-13T00:26:22.560-07:00Like when he wrote this, perhaps?
http://www.enter...Like when he wrote this, perhaps?<br />http://www.enterprisemission.com/sensor.htm<br /><br />The ECO sensor problem was solved using conventional engineering.<br /><br />Could you please reference me to the article<br />Describing NASA's conventional problem solving<br /><br />Thanksmoon real-estatenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-57911319703822201252009-08-12T18:22:51.234-07:002009-08-12T18:22:51.234-07:00WHAT !? ARE YOU Kidding ME? !
No you don't - ...WHAT !? ARE YOU Kidding ME? !<br /><br />No you don't - just pull the curser to the right<br />time<br />it will start stream/downloading from there.<br /><br />You don't need to wait at allmoon real-estatenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-80751994778227710342009-08-12T18:16:28.121-07:002009-08-12T18:16:28.121-07:00>>I specifically mentioned the time to start...>>I specifically mentioned the time to start viewing - 1:00:03<<<br /><br />That's all very well, but youtube is <i>streamed</i> video, meaning that I do have to wait a substantial part of that time until enough of the content has streamed. Sorry.expathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10369924104634464934noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8051630750074978974.post-6845051805933309482009-08-12T18:04:56.107-07:002009-08-12T18:04:56.107-07:00I am not the type that drowns somebody else with ...I am not the type that drowns somebody else with tons of information<br />I did not Ask of you to see the entire interview<br /><br />I specifically mentioned the time to start viewing - 1:00:03<br /><br />it is a 2 minute scene discussing one single photo for you to watch -<br />And comment onmoon real-estatenoreply@blogger.com